Cascading Disaster Models in Postburn Flash Flood [1]
May, Fred. 2007. Cascading disaster models in postburn flash flood. Pages 443-464 In: Butler, Bret W.; Cook, Wayne (comps.). The fire environment-innovations, management, and policy; conference proceedings. 26-30 March 2007; Destin, FL. Proceedings RMRS-P-46CD. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Modeling hydrologic and geomorphic hazards across post-fire landscapes using a self-organizing map approach [2]
Friedel, M.J. 2011. Modeling hydrologic and geomorphic hazards across post-fire landscapes using a self-organizing map approach. Environmental Modelling and Software 26: 1660-1674.
Predicting the probability and volume of postwildfire debris flows in the intermountain western United States [3]
Cannon, S.H., Gartner, J.E., Rupert, M.G., Michael, J.A., Rea, A.H., Parrett, C. 2010. Predicting the probability and volume of postwildfire debris flows in the intermountain western United States. GSA Bulletin 122: 127-144.
Predicting postfire erosion and mitigation effectiveness with a web-based probablistic erosion model [4]
Robichaud, P.R., Elliot, W.J., Pierson, F.B., Hall, D.E., Moffet, C.A. 2007. Predicting postfire erosion and mitigation effectiveness with a web-based probabilistic erosion model. Catena 71: 229-241.
Erosion Risk Management Tool (ERMiT) User Manual [5]
Robichaud, P.R.; Elliot, W.J.; Pierson, F.B.; Hall, D.E.; Moffet, C.A.; Ashmun, L.E. 2007. Erosion Risk Management Tool (ERMiT) user manual (version 2006.01.18). Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-188. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 24 p.
Validation of a probabilistic post-fire erosion model [6]
Robichaud, P.R.; Elliot, W.J; cx Lewis, W.J.; Miller, M.E. 2016. Validation of a probabilistic post-fire erosion model. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25(3): 337-350.
Predicting postfire sediment yields at the hillslope scale: Testing RUSLE and Disturbed WEPP [7]
Larsen, I.J., MacDonald, L.H. 2007. Predicting postfire sediment yields at the hillslope scale: testing RUSLE and Disturbed WEPP. Water Resources Research 43, W11412. doi: 10.1029/2006/WR005560.
Quantifying burn severity in a heterogenous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) [8]
Miller, J.D., Thode, A.E. 2006. Quantifying burn severity in a heterogenous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR). Remote Sensing of the Environment 109: 66-80.
Difference infiltrometer: a method to measure temporally variable infiltration rates during rainstorms [9]
Moody, J.A. and B.A. Ebel. 2012. Difference infiltrometer: a method to measure temporally variable infiltration rates during rainstorms. Hydrological Processes 26: 3312-3318.
An Analytical Method for Predicting Postwildfire Peak Discharges [10]
Moody, J.A., 2012, An analytical method for predicting postwildfire peak discharges: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5236, 36 pp.
Silt fences: an economical technique for measuring hillslope erosion [11]
Robichaud, Peter R.; Brown, Robert E. 2002. Silt fences: an economical technique for measuring hillslope erosion. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-94. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 24 p.
Quick Response Small Catchment Monitoring Techniques for Comparing Postfire Rehabilitation Treatment Effectiveness [12]
Robichaud, P.R., Brown, R.E. 2003. Quick response small catchment monitoring techniques for comparing postfire rehabilitation treatment effectiveness. In 'Proceedings of the first interagency conference on research in the watersheds.' pp. 663-667. (US Department of AGriculture, Agricultural Research Service: Tucson)
Assessing Post-Fire Values-at-Risk With a New Calculation Tool [13]
Calkin, D.E., K.D. Hyde, P.R. Robichaud, G.J. Jones, L.E. Ashmun, D. Loeffler. 2007. Assessing post-fire values-at-risk with a new calculation tool. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-205. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 32 p.
Field Guide for Mapping Post-Fire Soil Burn Severity [14]
Parsons, A., P.R. Robichaud, S.A. Lewis, C. Napper, and J.T. Clark. 2010. Field guide for mapping post-fire soil burn severity. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-243. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 49 p.
Burned Area Emergency Response Treatments Catalog [15]
Napper, C. 2006. Burned Area Emergency Response Treatments Catalog. Technical Report. 0625 1801-SDTDC, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, National Technology & Development Program, Watershed, Soil, Air Management. 266 p.
A Synthesis of Post-Fire Road Treatments for BAER Teams: Methods Treatment Effectiveness, and Decisionmaking Tools for Rehabilitation [16]
Foltz, Randy B.; Robichaud, Peter, R.; Rhee, Hakjun. 2009. A synthesis of post-fire road treatments for BAER teams: methods, treatment effectiveness, and decisionmaking tools for rehabilitation. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-228 Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 152 p.
Postfire Rehabilitation of the Hayman Fire [17]
Robichaud, Peter; MacDonald, Lee; Freeouf, Jeff; Neary, Dan; Martin, Deborah; Ashmun, Louise. 2003. Postfire rehabilitation of the Hayman Fire. In: Graham, Russell T., Technical Editor. Hayman Fire Case Study. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-114. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. P. 293-314.
Interagency Burned Area Emergency Response Guidebook [18]
FSM 2500, Watershed and Air Operations. WO Amendment 2500-2004-1. [Effective February 2006]. Chapter 2523âEmergency Stabilization Burned-Area Emergency Response (BAER).